💭 in your head · nothing to type
Picture two teams. The first spends a week choosing a model and tweaking training settings. The second spends a week going through its examples: removing duplicates, fixing mixed-up answers, adding rare cases.
Both trained a model on the same hardware.
Whose model do you think will handle the real task better?
💭 in your head · nothing to type
Most likely you bet on the second. A model learns exactly what it was shown — mistakes in the examples included.
It's the same idea as in module 04: the agent does what you phrased, not what you meant. In training, your phrasing is the dataset. Every crooked example is a crooked spec, repeated many times.
Consider where in your work you already have "input → correct output" examples that someone has checked.
Every ML project, from an email classifier to fine-tuning an LLM, goes through the same seven steps: